• About

The Reclusive Essayist

~ Rants about the 80s, 90s, 00s, and today

The Reclusive Essayist

Tag Archives: biology

Top Five Movie Science Fails

29 Tuesday Apr 2014

Posted by pcclsky in Nostalgia Related, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

AI, artificial intelligence, biology, Darwin, engineering, evolution, Hollywood, Lamarck, monster, movies, radioactivity, science, surface area to volume, top five list

As I’ve mentioned occasionally in earlier postings, having an extensive science background, there is not much more that upsets me in the world of “Hollywoodization” than the industry’s blatant disregard for science. I suppose, in a sense, I am “nitpicking”. After all, the average person has such a poor grasp on science and engineering that a few buzzwords and descriptions that are semi-plausible that anything can seem like it’s sound science. However, if you have even a mediocre understanding of some things you can want to rip your hair our every time Hollywood pulls out “BS Science/Engineering Plot Device #3”. So…I’ve compiled a short list of things Hollywood does that “sounds good” and what makes the scientists out there just plain hate going to the movies.

Honorable Mention – “Machines Take Over the World”

Sadly, I can only list this as an “honorable mention” because (sigh) technically it could be plausible one day as opposed to the other entries which are only plausible if we somehow are able to bend the laws of space and time using science that must obey the laws of space and time. But don’t hold your breath waiting for your cell phone to revolt and try and scramble your brain. As anyone who is in the computer field could tell you, the idea that a computer could actually do the slightest thing independently, including overthrow humanity, is ridiculous. Computers. Are. STUPID. They are unbelievably stupid. Trying to program a computer to do something as simple as perform a basic math algorithm is ridiculously complicated for a beginning programmer because they assume the computer has the slightest bit of intelligence, which it doesn’t. For a good analogy, if you’ve ever seen “Monty Python and the Holy Grail”, do you remember where that king is trying to get the guard to do the very simple task of watching his son and making sure he doesn’t leave? That’s pretty much what every programmer has to do with every program they write. Pretty much the only way that a computer could take over the world at this point is if a programmer programmed it to do so…and rest assured, the computer would screw it up numerous times and require months of debugging before it could succeed.

5. “Laser Death Beams”

What if I told you that humanity has had the ability to make laser cannons capable of wrecking mass havoc and destruction for years now? Yeah, all of those weapons they have in “Star Wars” and other science fiction blasting…what if I told you we could make stuff like that? Well, your first response would probably be: “How come we don’t do that?” Fairly simple. You know how if you shoot a bullet at the right type of reinforced metal, all you’ll get for your effort is the bullet bouncing right off, right? Well, bullets actually have the nice side effect of being imperfect and exploiting things like friction. Therefore, if you shoot that bullet dead on at that kind of surface, the bullet will deform and smash…as opposed to bounce off perfectly back into the gun you just fired and shoot you instead. Lasers don’t suffer from that sort of thing. No…lasers that are intense enough to destroy things not only would bounce back perfectly, they’d bounce off of the air. So if you ever tried using those sort of weapons on Earth, you’d only blow yourself up. Now, you could use them in a vacuum, say space, so maybe you can still have your X-Wings vs. TIE Fighters. But if the Death Star tried to blow up Alderaan, that moon-sized space station would go up in smoke while the citizens would point and laugh like Nelson from “The Simpsons”.

4. “Monster Biology”

I touched on this earlier on one of my trope suggestions, so I’m not going to go as in depth here. You can see it in detail looking it up in my archives. Suffice to say, “monster biology” might as well be called “f**k you, entire science of biology”. Whenever any monster shows up, it’s automatically ideally suited to killing humans, even if it never preyed on a human before that movie. Nope, the monster immediately thinks a human would be its new ideal prey the moment it sees it. On that note, the monster always has to eat continuously, meaning it will never stop eating humans so long as there is still one around to eat, whereas in the wild if a lion would finish killing one antelope and then immediately went after another one, not only would it do so on a full stomach but scavengers would come along and snatch up its latest kill. And yet in spite of needing to eat all the time, the monster can wait indefinitely for a trapped human to become available as a food source, when the fact that it needs to eat continuously means it would be better off going to find something else to kill and eat or it would starve to death quickly.

3. “Lamarckian Evolution Trumps Darwin”

Even if you’re not scientifically inclined, ever think that a movie with mundane animals and plants that suddenly turn into mankillers is insulting your intelligence? Well guess what…you’re absolutely right! Part of the reason that evolution probably still gets a bad wrap is because Hollywood essentially treats evolution nowadays in the same way it treated radiation back in the 60s and 70s. “Oh no! Radiation turns people into big green monsters instead of killing them through radiation poisoning! Why? Uh…it’s radiation!” Hollywood seems to have the idea that animals and plants can pretty much just “evolve overnight” to become hostile to humans. Seeing as examples are somewhat specific, I’ll pick on two big examples. In “The Ruins” (dear goodness…), we have ourselves a man-eating plant that can mimic cell phone signals. Wow. (A) I don’t think science has found a plant yet that can mimic sound of any kind. (B) Evolution doesn’t happen within individuals. Lamarckian Evolution suggested that if something wanted to evolve, it only had to “try hard”…like a Pokemon. But no, evolution takes place within populations over generations. (C) Assuming the plant was using real evolution and COULD mimic noise, that meant it would have had to have devoured human prey for millions of years that all would have had to have been using the exact same cell phone signal and gradually would have eventually had to have, by pure chance more or less because PLANTS DON’T HAVE EARS OR BRAINS and couldn’t do this behaviorally, gradually been able to mimic a cell phone signal of that type. It’s just…dang. You can pick on “The Happening” for similar reasons, but “After Earth” is worse because the suggestion is that everything on Earth has evolved to kill humans over the past 10,000 years. Just…pretty much everything that can be wrong with that statement is wrong. First, in terms of evolutionary time, 10,000 years might as well be a single second. If things could evolve that fast, we would never need to abandon Earth because everything on Earth would have evolved in response to our activity. Second, you can’t evolve to kill humans when there aren’t any humans around to create selection pressures to evolve in response to. That makes as much sense as saying that humans have evolved to kill xenomorphs from the “Alien” franchise without having ever encountered one.

2. “Surface Area-To-Volume Ratio…Whatever”

This is a classic one. How come we’re in no danger of being menaced by King Kong, Godzilla, or even big rabbits from “Night of the Lepus”…or for that matter the countless other critters that Hollywood has blown up to monstrous size over the years? Well, there’s a little thing called the “surface-area-to-volume-ratio” going on. What is that, you might ask? I’ll have to ask you to drag up your old math skills for that. Imagine, if you will, that you have a line that’s ten inches long. Now, how would you make a square out of that? Easy, you’d take four lengths of ten inches and make a square. But what is the surface area of that square? If you remember, it’s multiplying the length times the width, or 10 inches by 10 inches, and you end up getting 100 square inches. So…you see that something that is 10 inches long is 100 square inches in area. Now…remember volume? How about a cube that is 10 inches on a side? Well, similar to a square from a line, if you take those 100 square inch squares, six of them specifically, and put them together, you got yourself a cube. But what’s the volume? 100 square inches (the area of the bottom) times the height, which is 10 inches…for 1000 cubic inches. So…a cube that is 10 inches on an edge and 100 square inches on a side is 1000 cubic inches in volume. The central idea: as you increase the size of an object in one dimension, the size in another dimension grows much faster. That means you can’t get any creature up past a certain size before it crushes itself under the weight of its own skeleton or organs. Yet that hasn’t stopped Hollywood from blowing up creatures to unusual size for years. So much so that, in spite of this being overused, I hardly even care anymore.

But number one still drives me nuts…

1. “It’s Not on the Periodic Table”

They always talk about in sci-fi movies how aliens always technology made of elements not on the periodic table. That makes absolutely no sense. The reason the periodic table is so useful is that it is consistent for elements throughout the universe. Not just Earth…everywhere. That’s because all matter is made of protons, neutrons, and electrons everywhere. They aren’t made of phlebotonium and flubber simply because you go to a different galaxy. You can’t just “dream up” new elements. What you see on the periodic table is what you get. Oh, there are elements that aren’t on the periodic table yet…but that’s because those elements exist for only a few tiny fractions of a second before they split up. That’s why the radioactive elements are toward the rear end of the periodic table…they’re radioactive because they break apart into simpler elements over time. And the heavier the elements become, the more unstable they are (generally speaking). Even the elements that we have in the hundreds on the table don’t exist for too long. In short…if scientists found that alien technology was made out of a new element…they should check it again in a thousandth of a second. It’s probably on the table now.

 

Advertisements

Monster Biology

02 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by pcclsky in Trope Suggestions

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

biologist, biology, Earth, evolution, human, humans, monster, monsters, natural selection, trope, tropes

This trope would be an “inclusive” one, actually making up a series of smaller tropes. Everyone knows there are certain rules to surviving a horror film or a spy film or occasionally an action film. Monster films also have their own set of rules in regards to the monsters themselves, who go against all known biological science. Most of these also apply to “creature features”, ones where an animal has been mutated or enraged or is just a normal deadly predator one would find on Earth (like tigers or bears) than a monster.

All Monsters have Diabetes – It doesn’t matter if the monster just scarfed down a big meal…it has to eat again immediately. While in the wild, a meat-eating predator would just find a quiet place to chill and sleep off the meal or would bury or stash whatever it couldn’t eat and just guard that, monsters in movies treat humans like Pringles…they can’t have just one. They immediately go to gobble up another with undiminished enthusiasm. That first human went right through them. Humans, apparently, are the “Chinese food” of the monster world.

F**k the Surface Area to Volume Ratio – According to well-established biological science, the bigger you get, the slower your metabolism due to retaining heat due to exponentially bigger volume to surface area. Therefore, something tiny like a mouse eats far less of its body weight than an elephant would. Giant versions of the creatures apparently never got the message. Assuming the giant creature doesn’t crush itself under the weight of its own skeleton (which it would in real life), it has to eat just as much of its body weight if not more (see previous condition) to stay alive.

Humans are the Rarest of All Delicacies – Even if a monster has plenty of other food sources to go around, perhaps even ones more abundant and nutritionally valuable than humans, it will still always preferentially go after humans. For some reason, monsters are ideally suited to metabolize humans better than anything else…which usually makes no sense because the monster almost always developed in an environment void of humans (see further below). Not only that, but regardless of the amount of effort and energy it needs to expend to get through a vehicle or past a barricade or whatever other defense the humans erected, or regardless of if past encounters with humans led to pain or injury, the monster will continue to try to go after the human as long as it takes and as hard as it takes as opposed to looking for a different, easier meal or even a different human in some cases.

Darwinian Errors – Monsters/giant creatures that are native to Earth (aliens don’t count) always develop in a state of geographic isolation and apart from human civilization. Why? Because it’s obvious we’d be f**ked if they didn’t. Monsters/giant creatures always seem to be ideally suited to kill humans and prey on them. They even seem to be able to anticipate human thoughts and behavior to make them even easier to eat. Clearly, they would be the dominant life form on Earth if some act of chance hadn’t happened. (Nowhere is this more clear than in the Jurassic Park franchise, in which after three movies the score is Dinos: 50, Humans: 0, since many humans have become dino food while the humans have yet to even stomp a Compsagnathus to death.)

Water-Bear-Like Dormancy – This is the natural consequence of all of the above. If the monsters haven’t had contact with humans since the day human tribesman wandered wherever yet exclusively prey on humans, the only natural conclusion to a native Earth monster is that they can go dormant for hundreds, even thousands, of years at a time.

Evolve in Seconds! – This rarely occurs, but when it does it makes every biologist roll their eyes. Natural selection takes an exceedingly long time. If it didn’t, we’d never have to worry about environmental concerns because every plant and animal would adapt in a couple years or decades to whatever humans screwed up. Yet Hollywood seems to think evolution takes somewhere on the order of a couple years at most to a couple minutes at least in something that would make Lamarck raise his eyebrow. Somehow predators are able to evolve to kill humans over an extremely short period of time. The two best examples ironically involve normally benign things…plants. In “The Happening”, somehow all of Earth’s trees were able to evolve virtually overnight to secrete a scent that drives humans to suicide…which is completely, utterly, and totally impossible and ridiculous, especially since even the most neurotoxic plants in the world can’t make their predators do intentionally suicidal behavior through pollen. Then there’s “The Ruins”, in which somehow a predatory vine can mimic a cell phone signal. …I’m not even going to bother explaining how that makes as much sense as me turning into a 100 foot tall mountain of spaghetti and meatballs and devouring Hoboken, New Jersey in one bite. If you can’t see it already, then I’m surprised you don’t think “The Cat in the Hat” was based on a true story.

Advertisements

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013

Categories

  • Cinema Sins Knockoffs
  • Final Fantasy Ramblissida
  • Honest Fake Trailers
  • My Little Devotional: Christianity is Magic
  • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic Reviews
    • My Little Pony: Fiendship is Magic
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Equestria Girls
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ IDW Comic Friends Forever Series
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ IDW Comic Legends of Magic Series
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ IDW Comic Main Series
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ IDW Comic Micro-Series
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Season Five
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Season Four
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Season One
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Season Seven
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Season Six
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Season Three
    • My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ~ Season Two
  • Nostalgia Related
  • The Reclusive Essayist's Anime Junk Bin
  • Trope Suggestions
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy